Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtra

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Optical Scattering Electric Field Norm

Posted 23 ago 2016, 15:04 GMT-4 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics, RF & Microwave Engineering, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions, Results & Visualization Version 4.3a 5 Replies

Rahim Leung
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

I am currently attempting to model the optical scattering off a 2D nanoparticle. The background electric field is a plane wave only in the y direction, so I plotted both the electric field norm and the magnitude of the y component of the electric field. Both should yield the same result as the electric field only has a y component, but the plots showed a discrepancy between the two. Does anyone know a reason of why this discrepancy occurs?

Thanks!
5 Replies Last Post 24 ago 2016, 06:57 GMT-4
Evgeniy Kuznetsov
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 24 ago 2016, 02:56 GMT-4
Hi,

After scattering you have both y and x component of electric field. I think this is the reason.
Hi, After scattering you have both y and x component of electric field. I think this is the reason.
Rahim Leung
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 24 ago 2016, 04:32 GMT-4
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I've recently just made a plot of the magnitude of the electric field including the x and y components, but the x component had a negligible effect; the discrepancy still remained.

Both plots (of the e-field norm and magnitude that I calculated using sqrt(realdot(Ex, Ex) + realdot(Ey, Ey))) have the shape shape, but one appears to be stretched.

I have included a graph of the results for reference. Thanks!
Hi, Thanks for the reply. I've recently just made a plot of the magnitude of the electric field including the x and y components, but the x component had a negligible effect; the discrepancy still remained. Both plots (of the e-field norm and magnitude that I calculated using sqrt(realdot(Ex, Ex) + realdot(Ey, Ey))) have the shape shape, but one appears to be stretched. I have included a graph of the results for reference. Thanks!

Attachments:

Evgeniy Kuznetsov
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 24 ago 2016, 05:55 GMT-4
Ok, can you attach your model?
Ok, can you attach your model?
Rahim Leung
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 24 ago 2016, 06:12 GMT-4
Apologies. The file is too large to be attached in this thread.

Is the E-field norm (emw.normE) the norm of the scattered field or of the total field?

Thanks.
Apologies. The file is too large to be attached in this thread. Is the E-field norm (emw.normE) the norm of the scattered field or of the total field? Thanks.
Evgeniy Kuznetsov
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 24 ago 2016, 06:57 GMT-4
It is the norm of the total field.
It is the norm of the total field.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content