Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
15 feb 2011, 09:23 GMT-5
Hi,
As far as I know, in COMSOL 3.5, once you have "cut" your model and defined symmetry (typically E-plane and H-plane for a rectangular waveguide), then you have to define manually your ports (because the automatic port definition does not work any more once you have cut the model...).
Also, if you are interested in the power, take care that once you have cut your model, you should divide the input power accordingly (1/2 or 1/4).
Hi,
As far as I know, in COMSOL 3.5, once you have "cut" your model and defined symmetry (typically E-plane and H-plane for a rectangular waveguide), then you have to define manually your ports (because the automatic port definition does not work any more once you have cut the model...).
Also, if you are interested in the power, take care that once you have cut your model, you should divide the input power accordingly (1/2 or 1/4).
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
6 apr 2011, 00:00 GMT-4
Since you are more advanced regarding the problem of simmetry, I would like to know what are the boundary conditions to simulate a fourth of a nanowire where the electromagnetic wave is incident in the axial direction of the nanowire (small cylinder. I have tried to use with this fourth of cylinder the boundary conditions of floquet periodicity and continuity (see figure). How should I apply these conditions?
With respect to what you are discussing, Why should the port be modified manually? and what should be specified?
PS: I am attaching a picture of the fourth of cylinder representing my nanowire. This is not my original simulation. It is only meant for more clarity.
Thanks in advance
Since you are more advanced regarding the problem of simmetry, I would like to know what are the boundary conditions to simulate a fourth of a nanowire where the electromagnetic wave is incident in the axial direction of the nanowire (small cylinder. I have tried to use with this fourth of cylinder the boundary conditions of floquet periodicity and continuity (see figure). How should I apply these conditions?
With respect to what you are discussing, Why should the port be modified manually? and what should be specified?
PS: I am attaching a picture of the fourth of cylinder representing my nanowire. This is not my original simulation. It is only meant for more clarity.
Thanks in advance
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
6 apr 2011, 09:35 GMT-4
I'm not sure to fully understand your model: is your wire a sort of hollow cylinder?
If yes, I would say that you would need an E-plane and an H-plane, but not knowing the problem...
I'm not sure to fully understand your model: is your wire a sort of hollow cylinder?
If yes, I would say that you would need an E-plane and an H-plane, but not knowing the problem...
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
7 apr 2011, 10:43 GMT-4
the problem consists in measuring the absorption of radiation in a silicon nanowire. The incident electromagnetic wave reaches the nanowire (a cylinder in the figure) with "k" parallel to the axis of the cylinder. The wave is TM.
The figure shows the modeling of the problem: a solid silicon cylinder surrounded by air where the "air cubes" at the ends of the figure are Cartesian PMLS. My question is: taking advantage of the symmetrical geometry, How can I get the same results using only one fourth of the actual geometry? How do I do with the boundary conditions? Should I maintain the same boundary conditions? How should these boundary conditions be applied?
thanks!
the problem consists in measuring the absorption of radiation in a silicon nanowire. The incident electromagnetic wave reaches the nanowire (a cylinder in the figure) with "k" parallel to the axis of the cylinder. The wave is TM.
The figure shows the modeling of the problem: a solid silicon cylinder surrounded by air where the "air cubes" at the ends of the figure are Cartesian PMLS. My question is: taking advantage of the symmetrical geometry, How can I get the same results using only one fourth of the actual geometry? How do I do with the boundary conditions? Should I maintain the same boundary conditions? How should these boundary conditions be applied?
thanks!