Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2 gen 2010, 21:59 GMT-5
Based on your description, my initial thought is that conventional time-harmonic analysis applies. After all, in both 2D and 3D models using the RF module, you can specify a material's conductivity (sigma), which is what determines the lossiness of the material. This is seldom a strong function of frequency, for most ordinary dielectrics. If you want to study dispersion explicitly, then you should be able to specify a frequency-dependent value (or define a frequency dependent expression) for sigma.
It gets more interesting in the time domain version. The user-interface will still let you specify sigma, but clearly you could not define it explicitly as a function of frequency, since frequency has no well-defined value in a general time domain model. In principle, you could employ a time-dependent complex conductivity function, obtained via taking the Fourier-transform of your (presumably known) frequency-dependent conductivity function. I don't know if this would actually work or not, or what kind of solver-settings would then be best but I suspect the experts at Comsol could answer this. In particular, I expect such questions tend to arise in modeling plasmas.
I hope others will comment on your question further, since I would also like to hear what they have to say.
Based on your description, my initial thought is that conventional time-harmonic analysis applies. After all, in both 2D and 3D models using the RF module, you can specify a material's conductivity (sigma), which is what determines the lossiness of the material. This is seldom a strong function of frequency, for most ordinary dielectrics. If you want to study dispersion explicitly, then you should be able to specify a frequency-dependent value (or define a frequency dependent expression) for sigma.
It gets more interesting in the time domain version. The user-interface will still let you specify sigma, but clearly you could not define it explicitly as a function of frequency, since frequency has no well-defined value in a general time domain model. In principle, you could employ a time-dependent complex conductivity function, obtained via taking the Fourier-transform of your (presumably known) frequency-dependent conductivity function. I don't know if this would actually work or not, or what kind of solver-settings would then be best but I suspect the experts at Comsol could answer this. In particular, I expect such questions tend to arise in modeling plasmas.
I hope others will comment on your question further, since I would also like to hear what they have to say.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
3 gen 2010, 00:04 GMT-5
Based on your description, my initial thought is that conventional time-harmonic analysis applies. After all, in both 2D and 3D models using the RF module, you can specify a material's conductivity (sigma), which is what determines the lossiness of the material. This is seldom a strong function of frequency, for most ordinary dielectrics. If you want to study dispersion explicitly, then you should be able to specify a frequency-dependent value (or define a frequency dependent expression) for sigma.
It gets more interesting in the time domain version. The user-interface will still let you specify sigma, but clearly you could not define it explicitly as a function of frequency, since frequency has no well-defined value in a general time domain model. In principle, you could employ a time-dependent complex conductivity function, obtained via taking the Fourier-transform of your (presumably known) frequency-dependent conductivity function. I don't know if this would actually work or not, or what kind of solver-settings would then be best but I suspect the experts at Comsol could answer this. In particular, I expect such questions tend to arise in modeling plasmas.
I hope others will comment on your question further, since I would also like to hear what they have to say.
thank you Robert. it helps a lot.
i'll also paste my question in the modeling penal.
happy new year
[QUOTE]
Based on your description, my initial thought is that conventional time-harmonic analysis applies. After all, in both 2D and 3D models using the RF module, you can specify a material's conductivity (sigma), which is what determines the lossiness of the material. This is seldom a strong function of frequency, for most ordinary dielectrics. If you want to study dispersion explicitly, then you should be able to specify a frequency-dependent value (or define a frequency dependent expression) for sigma.
It gets more interesting in the time domain version. The user-interface will still let you specify sigma, but clearly you could not define it explicitly as a function of frequency, since frequency has no well-defined value in a general time domain model. In principle, you could employ a time-dependent complex conductivity function, obtained via taking the Fourier-transform of your (presumably known) frequency-dependent conductivity function. I don't know if this would actually work or not, or what kind of solver-settings would then be best but I suspect the experts at Comsol could answer this. In particular, I expect such questions tend to arise in modeling plasmas.
I hope others will comment on your question further, since I would also like to hear what they have to say.
[/QUOTE]
thank you Robert. it helps a lot.
i'll also paste my question in the modeling penal.
happy new year