Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Difference in shape of eigenmode by size of meshes
Posted 30 dic 2011, 14:39 GMT-5 Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions, Studies & Solvers, Structural Mechanics Version 4.2a 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hello.
I'm studying MEMS and NEMS in university.
To see the resonant frequency and shape of eigenmode at that frequency,
I used COMSOL 4.2a with solid mechanics.
Geometry of device is square membrane (thickness = 200nm, length of each side = 40 micron) and material
is Silicon Nitride.
When first tried with normal mesh size(free tetrahedral mesh), Comsol showed shape of normal mode which
is symmetric to axis across the center as shown in the second file attached.
But when I changed to the extremely fine mesh size(free tetrahedral mesh), shape of normal mode was
rotated to clockwise direction.
Are there any reason to rotation of mode shape?
When I made real sample and tested that device, shape of normal mode absolutely symmetric without rotation.
I'm studying MEMS and NEMS in university.
To see the resonant frequency and shape of eigenmode at that frequency,
I used COMSOL 4.2a with solid mechanics.
Geometry of device is square membrane (thickness = 200nm, length of each side = 40 micron) and material
is Silicon Nitride.
When first tried with normal mesh size(free tetrahedral mesh), Comsol showed shape of normal mode which
is symmetric to axis across the center as shown in the second file attached.
But when I changed to the extremely fine mesh size(free tetrahedral mesh), shape of normal mode was
rotated to clockwise direction.
Are there any reason to rotation of mode shape?
When I made real sample and tested that device, shape of normal mode absolutely symmetric without rotation.
Attachments:
1 Reply Last Post 31 dic 2011, 00:59 GMT-5