Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Perfectly absorbing boundary condition required for general 3-D EM problems
Posted 2 feb 2012, 11:52 GMT-5 RF & Microwave Engineering 0 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Scattering boundary conditions require either plane, cylindrical, or spherical scattered waves, and the wave front must be parallel to the boundary. There is a reference to "Far-Field Calculation" for "a general way of modeling an open boundary"--which is not fully supported by the description of FFC. PML implementation, like SBC, also requires cylindrical waves from a specified axis, spherical waves from a specified center point, etc. I do not see any appropriate boundary condition for general 3-D EM problems.
I would appreciate any comments on the merits of the following three techniques as well as the possibility that they may be implemented in COMSOL
(1) CFS-PMLs to ncrease the absorption of evanescent waves;
(2) Second-order PMLs to absorb both evanescent and propagating waves for all frequencies; or
(3) The novel adiabatic absorbers described in the following paper which have been used in simulaating unusual structures including photonic crystals where PMLs are not appropriate because the material properties are not an analytic function in the direction perpendicular to the boundary: A.F. Oskooi, L. Zhang, Y. Avniel and S.G. Johnson, "The failure of perfectly matched lyers, and towards their redemption by adiabatic absorbers," Optics Express, Vol. 16 (2008) 11376-11392.
Hello Mark Hagmann
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.