Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

to avoid inverted mesh elements

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

In 2D, how to avoid inverted mesh elements? Would triangular or rectangular meshing matter?


8 Replies Last Post 26 dic 2021, 09:45 GMT-5
Robert Koslover Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 years ago 5 dic 2021, 21:42 GMT-5

This usually is due to a problematic geometry. If you can, edit your geometry to specify all the boundaries, inside and out, without any extremely thin pieces or nearly-tangent lines, etc. Consider posting your model (.mph file) to the forum if you want more specific help.

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
This *usually* is due to a problematic geometry. If you can, edit your geometry to specify all the boundaries, inside and out, without any extremely thin pieces or nearly-tangent lines, etc. Consider posting your model (.mph file) to the forum if you want more specific help.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 years ago 7 dic 2021, 03:26 GMT-5

Thanks Dr Koslover, all I use is just a domain of a square. Is that a poor geometry?

Thanks Dr Koslover, all I use is just a domain of a square. Is that a poor geometry?

Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 years ago 7 dic 2021, 05:26 GMT-5

Hm, a square gives you inverted elements?

-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Hm, a square gives you inverted elements?

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 years ago 8 dic 2021, 03:16 GMT-5

at least as far as what the warning message says, though a glance of the deformed square doesn't show obvious inverted elements

at least as far as what the warning message says, though a glance of the deformed square doesn't show obvious inverted elements

Robert Koslover Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 years ago 8 dic 2021, 10:52 GMT-5

I suggest you post your model (the .mph file) to the forum.

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
I suggest you post your model (the .mph file) to the forum.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 years ago 20 dic 2021, 04:43 GMT-5

Most strangely, the warning suggest inverted elements near coordinate (1e5,1e5) while the domain size is only about 1*1.

Most strangely, the warning suggest inverted elements near coordinate (1e5,1e5) while the domain size is only about 1*1.

Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 years ago 20 dic 2021, 16:38 GMT-5

I assume that this happens during solution, and not in the initial configuration.

It seems that you have an ill-posed problem where, for example, a solid mechanics model 'blows up'. Such problems are, for example, common with some hyperelastic models that are not unconditionally stable. For an even more common and unexpected case, see the section about linear elasticity under geometric nonlinearity in https://www.comsol.com/blogs/modeling-linear-elastic-materials-how-difficult-can-it-be/ .

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
I assume that this happens during solution, and not in the initial configuration. It seems that you have an ill-posed problem where, for example, a solid mechanics model 'blows up'. Such problems are, for example, common with some hyperelastic models that are not unconditionally stable. For an even more common and unexpected case, see the section about linear elasticity under geometric nonlinearity in .

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 3 years ago 26 dic 2021, 09:45 GMT-5
Updated: 3 years ago 26 dic 2021, 09:45 GMT-5

I assume that this happens during solution, and not in the initial configuration.

It seems that you have an ill-posed problem where, for example, a solid mechanics model 'blows up'. Such problems are, for example, common with some hyperelastic models that are not unconditionally stable. For an even more common and unexpected case, see the section about linear elasticity under geometric nonlinearity in .

Thank you! However, though the warning suggests inverted elements near coordinate (1e5,1e5), the domain (1*1) after the computation looks normal in shape rather than sth that blows up and the whole computation is completed without error messages.

>I assume that this happens during solution, and not in the initial configuration. > >It seems that you have an ill-posed problem where, for example, a solid mechanics model 'blows up'. Such problems are, for example, common with some hyperelastic models that are not unconditionally stable. For an even more common and unexpected case, see the section about linear elasticity under geometric nonlinearity in . Thank you! However, though the **warning** suggests inverted elements near coordinate (1e5,1e5), the domain (1*1) after the computation looks normal in shape rather than sth that blows up and the whole computation is completed without **error** messages.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.