Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
[3.5a thermal]Surface to surface radiative exchange
Posted 15 feb 2010, 06:36 GMT-5 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hello to everyone
I have some problems with surface to surface boundary condition.
I have two parallel surfaces that after conduction analysis display a very similar temperature distribution, that is 54.05 °C for surface A and 54.01 °C for B surface. Now i want to analyze the model better and i want to insert surface to surface radiation exchange between these two surfaces.
So I create a group for these two surfaces, i insert emissivity and I put 0 K for ambient T, at the end i launch analysis. When my analysis ends i find a temperature distribution on these surfaces that is lower than the lower starting T(54.01°C).
I think that adding only these exchange i should find a T that is between the starting T.
What is the problem? Watching the equation explanation for radiation i find that also in surface to surface there is ambient interaction. can I change the equation to erase this contribution?
Thank you in advance
Luca
I have some problems with surface to surface boundary condition.
I have two parallel surfaces that after conduction analysis display a very similar temperature distribution, that is 54.05 °C for surface A and 54.01 °C for B surface. Now i want to analyze the model better and i want to insert surface to surface radiation exchange between these two surfaces.
So I create a group for these two surfaces, i insert emissivity and I put 0 K for ambient T, at the end i launch analysis. When my analysis ends i find a temperature distribution on these surfaces that is lower than the lower starting T(54.01°C).
I think that adding only these exchange i should find a T that is between the starting T.
What is the problem? Watching the equation explanation for radiation i find that also in surface to surface there is ambient interaction. can I change the equation to erase this contribution?
Thank you in advance
Luca
1 Reply Last Post 16 feb 2010, 02:08 GMT-5