Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtra

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

PMLs in the Mathematics (PDEs) Module

Posted 11 feb 2013, 19:06 GMT-5 Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions 4 Replies

Will Berdanier
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi all,

I'm having trouble making PMLs work in the PDEs module. I'm just working on a toy model at the moment - the diffraction pattern example from the model library but with a PML on the outside of the chamber. I want to then step up to my real problem - launching a wave in a complicated geometry via a point source and using the PMLs to prevent reflections off the walls.

Could somebody take a look at this and explain to me what I am doing wrong?

Thanks.
4 Replies Last Post 26 apr 2015, 13:50 GMT-4
Will Berdanier
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 11 feb 2013, 19:06 GMT-5
Model attached.
Model attached.
Nils Malm COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 feb 2013, 03:14 GMT-5
Hi Will,
While PDE interfaces are not disabled in domains with PMLs or Infinite Elements (as other physics not supporting them), the PML/IE does not actually apply. That is, the PDE is not sensitive to the domain's PML status in any way. The underlying reason for this is that some people may want to, e.g., set up an equation solving for a material property or computing some kind of auxiliary quantity - which would not have been possible if the PDEs had been disabled in PML and IE domains. Since the PDE interfaces are meant for advanced modeling, we cannot assume anything about what users want to use them for. Therefore, we allow almost everything and do not try to interpret or transform the equations in any way. So for the PDE interfaces, what you specify is essentially always what you get.

If you are modeling an equation which is not covered by any COMSOL module supporting PMLs, you can still use the transformation matrix and Jacobian determinant defined by the built-in PMLs in the PML domains to define your own scaled equations. This, however, is only possible (or at least straight-forward) when modeling in the weak form. Another alternative, which lets you hand over the PML transformations to the COMSOL machinery, is to set up your equation as a new physics interface using the Physics Builder.
Hi Will, While PDE interfaces are not disabled in domains with PMLs or Infinite Elements (as other physics not supporting them), the PML/IE does not actually apply. That is, the PDE is not sensitive to the domain's PML status in any way. The underlying reason for this is that some people may want to, e.g., set up an equation solving for a material property or computing some kind of auxiliary quantity - which would not have been possible if the PDEs had been disabled in PML and IE domains. Since the PDE interfaces are meant for advanced modeling, we cannot assume anything about what users want to use them for. Therefore, we allow almost everything and do not try to interpret or transform the equations in any way. So for the PDE interfaces, what you specify is essentially always what you get. If you are modeling an equation which is not covered by any COMSOL module supporting PMLs, you can still use the transformation matrix and Jacobian determinant defined by the built-in PMLs in the PML domains to define your own scaled equations. This, however, is only possible (or at least straight-forward) when modeling in the weak form. Another alternative, which lets you hand over the PML transformations to the COMSOL machinery, is to set up your equation as a new physics interface using the Physics Builder.
Xiang Yan
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 6 mag 2014, 11:15 GMT-4
Hi Will,
Are you able to implement PMLs in PDE now? I am having the same problem now.

Thanks,
Xiang
Hi Will, Are you able to implement PMLs in PDE now? I am having the same problem now. Thanks, Xiang
Ulac Smah
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 10 years ago 26 apr 2015, 13:50 GMT-4
Hi everybody,

Are you able to implement PMLs in a weak form? I am having the same problem now.

Thanks,

Ulac.
Hi everybody, Are you able to implement PMLs in a weak form? I am having the same problem now. Thanks, Ulac.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content