Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
4 apr 2013, 06:05 GMT-4
Diana,
port boundaries must bei PEC or impedance boundary conditions. That is what I stumbled across when I tried it the first time.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
www.emphys.com
Diana,
port boundaries must bei PEC or impedance boundary conditions. That is what I stumbled across when I tried it the first time.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
http://www.emphys.com
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16 apr 2013, 12:20 GMT-4
Hello,
thank you for your reply. However, I am still confused since also the impedance boundary condition does not take my boundary choice. Maybe there is something altogether wrong with my model of the cross section, could someone take a look? I simply want to include a RF excitation (travelling into the plane of my model) to the center conductor and see the field distribution.
Hello,
thank you for your reply. However, I am still confused since also the impedance boundary condition does not take my boundary choice. Maybe there is something altogether wrong with my model of the cross section, could someone take a look? I simply want to include a RF excitation (travelling into the plane of my model) to the center conductor and see the field distribution.
Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16 apr 2013, 12:56 GMT-4
Diana,
I indeed think that the model is not appropriate. My comments:
1. The metallization is modelled infinitely thin. This results in singularities
2. In planar symmetry you can't send a wave into the plane. If you connect a lumped port it would be connected all along the plane's normal direction. This is probably not what you want.
I put a lumped port into your model to show in principle how a lumped port is to be defined. The lumped port always connects two PEC or impedance boundaries. However for the above mentioned reasons this will still not do what you want.
I think you must go to 3D and model the conductor with finite dimensions, not just as boundaries.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
www.emphys.com
Diana,
I indeed think that the model is not appropriate. My comments:
1. The metallization is modelled infinitely thin. This results in singularities
2. In planar symmetry you can't send a wave into the plane. If you connect a lumped port it would be connected all along the plane's normal direction. This is probably not what you want.
I put a lumped port into your model to show in principle how a lumped port is to be defined. The lumped port always connects two PEC or impedance boundaries. However for the above mentioned reasons this will still not do what you want.
I think you must go to 3D and model the conductor with finite dimensions, not just as boundaries.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
http://www.emphys.com
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
22 apr 2013, 06:46 GMT-4
how to design input and output coplanar waveguide so they can be coupled .
how to design input and output coplanar waveguide so they can be coupled .