Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Important question about imaging results
Posted 12 set 2010, 19:29 GMT-4 2 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hello,
Attached is an image of the model I am completing. I have a question I deem to be very important would truly appreciate a response. Is there anyway I could emphasize the temperature gradient across the gold resistor/polymer cavity interface by changing the temperature range of the graph? Like trying to make it 385 to 395 K?
Any help will be appreciated,
Daniel
Attached is an image of the model I am completing. I have a question I deem to be very important would truly appreciate a response. Is there anyway I could emphasize the temperature gradient across the gold resistor/polymer cavity interface by changing the temperature range of the graph? Like trying to make it 385 to 395 K?
Any help will be appreciated,
Daniel
Attachments:
2 Replies Last Post 13 set 2010, 02:05 GMT-4
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Hi
Yes in both 3.5 and 4 you can a) choose units i.e.[degC] would probabl be more appropriate and change the scale (min,max). I often add also a countour graphs on top to easier see the steps
--
Good luck
Ivar
Yes in both 3.5 and 4 you can a) choose units i.e.[degC] would probabl be more appropriate and change the scale (min,max). I often add also a countour graphs on top to easier see the steps
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Ivar,
THANK YOU! Can't believe I never noticed that nice range button placed so closely to the expression field and everything else. Hah. I appreciate your time and help
Daniel
THANK YOU! Can't believe I never noticed that nice range button placed so closely to the expression field and everything else. Hah. I appreciate your time and help
Daniel