Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
1 nov 2010, 05:59 GMT-4
Or does anyone know a good information source giving an analytic explanation of the hysteretic behavior of piezoelectric materials ?
Any information can help.
Thanks and have a nice day
Nicolas
Or does anyone know a good information source giving an analytic explanation of the hysteretic behavior of piezoelectric materials ?
Any information can help.
Thanks and have a nice day
Nicolas
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
1 nov 2010, 12:11 GMT-4
Hi
damping is one of the most delicate issues in dynamical structural amnalysis, what to choose !?
It depends on the material and the assembly method of your part. for PZT you have as well material, as local heating, electric current damping etc ... many to choose from ;)
As litterature on the use of PZT I can propose the excellent books of Pr. A. Preumont (Uni Liège) Spriner and Kluewer
or on the material itself such as "Electroceramics" A.J. Moulson J.M. Herbert, Wiley. or if you read French: "Matériaux Pièzoelectriques" M. Brissaud by PPUR.
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
damping is one of the most delicate issues in dynamical structural amnalysis, what to choose !?
It depends on the material and the assembly method of your part. for PZT you have as well material, as local heating, electric current damping etc ... many to choose from ;)
As litterature on the use of PZT I can propose the excellent books of Pr. A. Preumont (Uni Liège) Spriner and Kluewer
or on the material itself such as "Electroceramics" A.J. Moulson J.M. Herbert, Wiley. or if you read French: "Matériaux Pièzoelectriques" M. Brissaud by PPUR.
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
1 nov 2010, 12:51 GMT-4
Hi,
Indeed, I've seen that damping constituted a real issue when trying to model the deformation of piezoelectric materials and especially stacks.
I know that we have the last book you mentionned so I will take a closer look to it. For the others I will also try.
Many thanks for your help Ivar
Nicolas
Hi,
Indeed, I've seen that damping constituted a real issue when trying to model the deformation of piezoelectric materials and especially stacks.
I know that we have the last book you mentionned so I will take a closer look to it. For the others I will also try.
Many thanks for your help Ivar
Nicolas
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
14 set 2011, 14:47 GMT-4
Nicolas-
I realize this forum is quite old- hope you've resolved this issue. I am in a similar situation where I am modeling piezoelectric ceramic stacks but I am very new to comsol so I haven't fully implemented these things in practice.
So far, I've ignored the issue of damping within the ceramic completely since the ceramics I deal with are relatively lossless compared to other dissipation methods in my model (elastomers). However, if you need to model damping mechanisms for time dependent studies or whatever, note that the "loss tangent/dissipation constant/Q value" reported by most manufacters is an electrical measurement. Of course, in piezoelectric materials, electrical and mechanical domains are coupled so it is really a hybrid of both electrical and mechanical loss factors. This is different than the structural loss factor (eta) damping model in the structural analysis package. A closer estimation for structural loss factor, try to find if the manufacturer has a "Qm" value and take eta=1/Qm. This might be on the order of 0.0015 to 0.05 depending on your material. For reference, a thick sheet of aluminum typically has an eta of ~0.002. Again, this is an estimation depending on which direction your material is poled relative to the applied force.
Nicolas-
I realize this forum is quite old- hope you've resolved this issue. I am in a similar situation where I am modeling piezoelectric ceramic stacks but I am very new to comsol so I haven't fully implemented these things in practice.
So far, I've ignored the issue of damping within the ceramic completely since the ceramics I deal with are relatively lossless compared to other dissipation methods in my model (elastomers). However, if you need to model damping mechanisms for time dependent studies or whatever, note that the "loss tangent/dissipation constant/Q value" reported by most manufacters is an electrical measurement. Of course, in piezoelectric materials, electrical and mechanical domains are coupled so it is really a hybrid of both electrical and mechanical loss factors. This is different than the structural loss factor (eta) damping model in the structural analysis package. A closer estimation for structural loss factor, try to find if the manufacturer has a "Qm" value and take eta=1/Qm. This might be on the order of 0.0015 to 0.05 depending on your material. For reference, a thick sheet of aluminum typically has an eta of ~0.002. Again, this is an estimation depending on which direction your material is poled relative to the applied force.