Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Identity pairs being ignored in structural mechanics problem

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

[ drive.google.com/file/d/0B3QaD21DDcpNUU5zMFA3cnhxalk/view?usp=sharing ]

The file above (16 MB large) has a simple 3d cylindrical structure being deformed by 10 N boundary load along the x-axis at its tip. There are three concentric cylinders and two spring-like structures. The load is applied only across the upper caps of the three cylinders.

From the results-stress graph and the point evaluation of the displacement of a point close to the tip in the spring domain, one can see that the springs are completely unaffected by the boundary load.

When I applied an additional load only across the spring tips, the resluts showed deformation in the springs alone and ignored the cylinder.

In short, in spite of the correct identity pairs being formed in the definitions section, the software is not recognizing that all the domains must be affected by the load and that they must deform together.

Any clue as to what is happening?

0 Replies Last Post 8 mag 2016, 16:16 GMT-4
COMSOL Moderator

Hello Radhika Rajaram

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.