Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
21 dic 2016, 02:31 GMT-5
Hi
I do not believe that was possible back in old 3.5 days ;)
Today with the newer versions there are the "Rigid Body" domains and the full RBD module to handle this.
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
I do not believe that was possible back in old 3.5 days ;)
Today with the newer versions there are the "Rigid Body" domains and the full RBD module to handle this.
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
21 dic 2016, 03:02 GMT-5
Hi Ivar,
in my university there is only the 3.5a version of Comsol, so I can't use next versions.
Regards,
GA.
Hi Ivar,
in my university there is only the 3.5a version of Comsol, so I can't use next versions.
Regards,
GA.
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
21 dic 2016, 14:50 GMT-5
Hello
Well back in 3.5 time, I used the trick you just said: turned up the Young modulus, to make my "rigid" parts real stiff.
But do not overdo it, 1000 to 10'000 times is already quite a lot, as else you might get numerical scaling issues. Note that eigenfrequencies scale as sqrt(E/rho) so these increase less than the Young modulus.
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hello
Well back in 3.5 time, I used the trick you just said: turned up the Young modulus, to make my "rigid" parts real stiff.
But do not overdo it, 1000 to 10'000 times is already quite a lot, as else you might get numerical scaling issues. Note that eigenfrequencies scale as sqrt(E/rho) so these increase less than the Young modulus.
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
21 dic 2016, 16:15 GMT-5
Hi Ivar,
I'd like to avoid the possibility of numerical issues. Is there another way to do it? The bigger Young's modulus, the bigger the possibility of numerical issues.
Thank you very much,
GA.
Hi Ivar,
I'd like to avoid the possibility of numerical issues. Is there another way to do it? The bigger Young's modulus, the bigger the possibility of numerical issues.
Thank you very much,
GA.