Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
7 years ago
22 giu 2017, 10:22 GMT-4
Updated:
7 years ago
22 giu 2017, 10:22 GMT-4
Although you didn't provide the details of your model, one of the most common causes of this type of behavior is that the frequency is below the cutoff frequency for the waveguide mode that you are trying to launch. If your adjustment to the waveguide geometry involved reducing the size of a cross-section dimension, then that raises the cutoff frequency. If the cutoff frequency is above your specified frequency, then the mode will not propagate and you will see a (generally rapid) exponential decay of the field away from the launching port.
Although you didn't provide the details of your model, one of the most common causes of this type of behavior is that the frequency is below the cutoff frequency for the waveguide mode that you are trying to launch. If your adjustment to the waveguide geometry involved reducing the size of a cross-section dimension, then that raises the cutoff frequency. If the cutoff frequency is above your specified frequency, then the mode will not propagate and you will see a (generally rapid) exponential decay of the field away from the launching port.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
7 years ago
12 lug 2017, 06:54 GMT-4
Hello Mr. Koslover,
Thank you for your reply. I do see the behavior of rapid decay of the field away from the launching port. However, the interesting thing is that I observe this behavior if I increase the waveguide cross-section (CS). When I decrease the waveguide CS, smaller wavelengths propagate!
My understanding of the cut-off frequency (wavelength) is its inverse sqrt dependence on the waveguide cross section dimensions. So, for a given cross-section of the waveguide, I can theoretically calculate the cut-off frequency (wavelength). However, what I observe in COMSOL is that no field propagates above the cut-off frequency (or below the cut-off wavelength). This is opposite of what must happen. No light should propagate below the cut-off frequency (or above the cut-off wavelength).
I am not sure if I am doing any mistake here. The model is the standard model that can be downloaded from COMSOL website (
www.comsol.com/model/dielectric-slab-waveguide-14709).
Hello Mr. Koslover,
Thank you for your reply. I do see the behavior of rapid decay of the field away from the launching port. However, the interesting thing is that I observe this behavior if I increase the waveguide cross-section (CS). When I decrease the waveguide CS, smaller wavelengths propagate!
My understanding of the cut-off frequency (wavelength) is its inverse sqrt dependence on the waveguide cross section dimensions. So, for a given cross-section of the waveguide, I can theoretically calculate the cut-off frequency (wavelength). However, what I observe in COMSOL is that no field propagates above the cut-off frequency (or below the cut-off wavelength). This is opposite of what must happen. No light should propagate below the cut-off frequency (or above the cut-off wavelength).
I am not sure if I am doing any mistake here. The model is the standard model that can be downloaded from COMSOL website (https://www.comsol.com/model/dielectric-slab-waveguide-14709).