Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Problems encountered in COMSOL 4.1(Out-of-core; Java heap space; parameterized geometry)
Posted 15 apr 2011, 22:29 GMT-4 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics, Heat Transfer & Phase Change, Geometry, Results & Visualization, Studies & Solvers Version 4.1 2 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi All
I have used Comsol for a short time, and the following questions or errors puzzled me.
Descriptions:
Version: 4.1.0.185
Memory:3.25G
Platform: Windows XP
Questions:
1, Out-of-core
what do this mean in the direct solver setting? Will it be useful for saving memory if I turn on the option?
2,Parameterized geometry
We want to simulate the mobile induction heating process, and by now it's known that sweeping Parameterized geometry and ALE(moving mesh) can deal with the issue. So could you please make comparison between the two methods, especially on the reliability, precision, and convergence difficulty? And how to add to the precision of the solution by sweeping Parameterized geometry
3, Error in sweep: Java heap space
when a parametric sweep was conducted to move the position of a sub-domain, the first several position values got the solution successfully. And then the solver stopped and warned "Error in sweep: Java heap space".
How to get through this problem? I have about 100 position values to sweep, but it can only solve the first several ones.
Hoping for your advice,
Best regards
Yulong Yang
I have used Comsol for a short time, and the following questions or errors puzzled me.
Descriptions:
Version: 4.1.0.185
Memory:3.25G
Platform: Windows XP
Questions:
1, Out-of-core
what do this mean in the direct solver setting? Will it be useful for saving memory if I turn on the option?
2,Parameterized geometry
We want to simulate the mobile induction heating process, and by now it's known that sweeping Parameterized geometry and ALE(moving mesh) can deal with the issue. So could you please make comparison between the two methods, especially on the reliability, precision, and convergence difficulty? And how to add to the precision of the solution by sweeping Parameterized geometry
3, Error in sweep: Java heap space
when a parametric sweep was conducted to move the position of a sub-domain, the first several position values got the solution successfully. And then the solver stopped and warned "Error in sweep: Java heap space".
How to get through this problem? I have about 100 position values to sweep, but it can only solve the first several ones.
Hoping for your advice,
Best regards
Yulong Yang
2 Replies Last Post 16 apr 2011, 08:53 GMT-4