Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Theory Magnetic Fields Interface. A doubt
Posted 25 mag 2011, 06:49 GMT-4 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics Version 4.1, Version 4.2 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Dear COMSOL users,
I am working with Magnetic Fields (mf) and I have read the part of the guide titled by "Theory for the Magnetic Fields Interface" and there, it is said that the term involving the velocity (v) only applies in the 2D and axisymmetric formulations. My question is why it must be applied in this cases and what it means.
On the other way, meanwhile in Frequency Domain Equation it is used the term der(D)/der(t), why isn't it used in Transient Equation?
Finally, it isn't really applied the Faraday Law that says: E=-grad(V)-der(A)/der(t) but E=- der(A)/der(t), why is it taken grad(V)=0?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Isa
I am working with Magnetic Fields (mf) and I have read the part of the guide titled by "Theory for the Magnetic Fields Interface" and there, it is said that the term involving the velocity (v) only applies in the 2D and axisymmetric formulations. My question is why it must be applied in this cases and what it means.
On the other way, meanwhile in Frequency Domain Equation it is used the term der(D)/der(t), why isn't it used in Transient Equation?
Finally, it isn't really applied the Faraday Law that says: E=-grad(V)-der(A)/der(t) but E=- der(A)/der(t), why is it taken grad(V)=0?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Isa
1 Reply Last Post 25 mag 2011, 07:06 GMT-4