Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16 giu 2011, 10:02 GMT-4
Trying for a bump with more detail.
I have air moving through a duct, forced through a heat sink, and out another duct. All resting on a metallic.
I would like several outer boundaries, particularly of duct, heat sink, and base of to radiate-to-ambient. I do not wish them to have thermal insulation, but that seems to be a recurring default.
Thanks for your help.
Trying for a bump with more detail.
I have air moving through a duct, forced through a heat sink, and out another duct. All resting on a metallic.
I would like several outer boundaries, particularly of duct, heat sink, and base of to radiate-to-ambient. I do not wish them to have thermal insulation, but that seems to be a recurring default.
Thanks for your help.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16 giu 2011, 10:53 GMT-4
Hi,
I am not sure I understand the problem. The defualt boundary condition is 'thermal insulation' in order to have something different that BC must be overridden, that is achieved by adding a different boundary condition and selecting that surface/edge/domain that must have a different boundary condition.
Cheers
Hi,
I am not sure I understand the problem. The defualt boundary condition is 'thermal insulation' in order to have something different that BC must be overridden, that is achieved by adding a different boundary condition and selecting that surface/edge/domain that must have a different boundary condition.
Cheers
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16 giu 2011, 11:16 GMT-4
I believe this is what I have done by selecting "radiate-to-ambient". I have one ambient temperature, and one surface emissivity for each radiating material.
These surfaces appear selected as "radiate-to-ambient", but also appear as insulated. When I de-select them in Thermal Insulation, they automatically revert to thermal insulation.
Should radiate-to-ambient not be an adequate boundary condition to override the default thermal insulation?
I believe this is what I have done by selecting "radiate-to-ambient". I have one ambient temperature, and one surface emissivity for each radiating material.
These surfaces appear selected as "radiate-to-ambient", but also appear as insulated. When I de-select them in Thermal Insulation, they automatically revert to thermal insulation.
Should radiate-to-ambient not be an adequate boundary condition to override the default thermal insulation?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16 giu 2011, 11:37 GMT-4
Hi,
If you add the 'Surface-to-Ambient Radiation' and select the desired boundary then in the default 'thermal insulation' boundary it still apears with a writing between parenthesis 'overridden' which means that thermal insulation does not apply any more.
Cheers
Hi,
If you add the 'Surface-to-Ambient Radiation' and select the desired boundary then in the default 'thermal insulation' boundary it still apears with a writing between parenthesis 'overridden' which means that thermal insulation does not apply any more.
Cheers