Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
2D geometry vs 3D geometry
Posted 20 giu 2011, 12:03 GMT-4 Geometry Version 4.0 3 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I created a workplane out of a 3D geometry and then created a 2D object i.e. a circle, I understand that the 2D geometry ought to be embedded into the 3D one, but when I clicked on one of the physics (in the sense that I was about to assign sorta boundary conditions to the 2D geometry), I cannot see the embedded 2D geometry, not even as a boundary or domain or edge etc. Any clues that I can assign a boundary condition to the 2D geometry?
Many thanks!!
liwah
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I had a similar problem. The 2D object doesn't seem to be considered as a proper boundary or a line in the 3D environment.
In my case, I wanted to create a circle on a cylinder, so I did a plane and then I took the difference between the cylinder and the plane.
Please tell me if you found something else!
Guillermo
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
1) create 2d object in work plane (centered at default 0,0,0 location)
2) do Geometry -> Transformed -> Copy,
a) deselect [ ] Keep input objects
b) translate Copy to correct location
3) assign properties to the Copy, and continue..
The work plane will remain in the build list, but disappear as a boundary.
How I *do* wish the "Embed" menu item from 3.5 would be reinstated..
Dave
Disclaimer: I am not an expert; there may be a better way :)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
The "embedding" is implicit i V4, so if you, for example, create a circle in a work plane that coincides with the side of a block, the analyzed geometry includes the circle area as a separate boundary in the 3D model. You should not need to take any additional steps before proceeding to define your boundary conditions and so on.
Best regards,
Magnus Ringh, COMSOL