Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Completely wetted or non-wetted wall with phase field

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hey !

I've been trying to make a simulation of completely wetted or non-wetted walls (theta_w=0 or theta_w=pi) with phase field but it's always diverging. Have you ever tried and/or manage to do so ? How would you implement that plz ?

Thx in advance Joseph


1 Reply Last Post 9 lug 2019, 14:42 GMT-4
Ram Krishna Fluid and Thermal Science, Transport Phenomena

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 5 years ago 9 lug 2019, 14:42 GMT-4
Updated: 5 years ago 9 lug 2019, 14:41 GMT-4

I have tried complete wetting and other contact angles in Phase-field simulations. It works for me in most of the cases. The divergence is possibly due to inconsistent boundary conditions and defining phase-field features such as interface thickness and phase field tuning parameters. Go through this blog for more information on phase field modeling.

https://www.comsol.co.in/support/knowledgebase/1239/

I have tried complete wetting and other contact angles in Phase-field simulations. It works for me in most of the cases. The divergence is possibly due to inconsistent boundary conditions and defining phase-field features such as interface thickness and phase field tuning parameters. Go through this blog for more information on phase field modeling. https://www.comsol.co.in/support/knowledgebase/1239/

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.