Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
22 gen 2020, 16:54 GMT-5
Updated:
5 years ago
22 gen 2020, 16:57 GMT-5
Did you mean 10^-8m-10^-7m (aka, 10 nanometers to 100 nanometers) range? If so, and if you are talking about visible light (wavelength about 400-700 nanometers) then the RF module might be a good fit, at least if your goal is to model phenomena that can be described by classical electromagnetism.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Did you mean 10^-8m-10^-7m (aka, 10 nanometers to 100 nanometers) range? If so, and if you are talking about visible light (wavelength about 400-700 nanometers) then the RF module might be a good fit, at least if your goal is to model phenomena that can be described by classical electromagnetism.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
23 gen 2020, 00:06 GMT-5
Did you mean 10^-8m-10^-7m (aka, 10 nanometers to 100 nanometers) range? If so, and if you are talking about visible light (wavelength about 400-700 nanometers) then the RF module might be a good fit, at least if your goal is to model phenomena that can be described by classical electromagnetism.
Yes. The wavelength of the EMR I am going for is 700nm. The object size is also within the 10-100 nanometer range. So we would use the Radio Frequency module going off what you are saying.
>Did you mean 10^-8m-10^-7m (aka, 10 nanometers to 100 nanometers) range? If so, and if you are talking about visible light (wavelength about 400-700 nanometers) then the RF module might be a good fit, at least if your goal is to model phenomena that can be described by classical electromagnetism.
Yes. The wavelength of the EMR I am going for is 700nm. The object size is also within the 10-100 nanometer range. So we would use the Radio Frequency module going off what you are saying.