Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Scattered field formulation: User defined k vectors for floquet periodicity

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I am trying to simulate a gold resonator on substrate excited by an incident linearly polarized plane wave. I am using the scattered field formulation to do this (instead of port boundary conditions) in order to easily plot the electric field enhancement (electric near field / background electric field).

The goal is to simulate an array of such resonators, and so far I have been using the continuity boundary condition on the sides of the unit cell to model this. However, I don't think this is correct, as I am getting some strange effects at certain frequencies of the incident beam (it sets up what looks like a specific mode of the electric field enhancement within the substrate--not sure how to best describe this).

However, when I try to set up floquet periodicity instead of continuity b.c.s, the k vectors in x,y, and z must be defined. However, I am completely lost as to how to do this. I'm not even sure of the physical significance of continuity b.c.s versus floquet b.c.s.

If someone could explain this difference, and how to set up the k vector definitions, I would much appreciate it!


0 Replies Last Post 28 gen 2020, 14:10 GMT-5
COMSOL Moderator

Hello Ann P.

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.