Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Loss in heat instead of heat flux at boundary?

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Is there a way to simulate a defined loss in heat at a boundary? So instead of having W/(m^2K) you'd have J/(m^2K).

Right now heat flux is the only time dependant variable that prevents my model from being stationary.


1 Reply Last Post 8 mar 2020, 11:08 GMT-4
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 5 years ago 8 mar 2020, 11:08 GMT-4

Andreas,

wouldn't a stationary thermal model without any heat fluxes simply equilibrate to a uniform temperature in the whole model? If this is the case you could simply integrate the total heat capacity of the model and calculate the new temperature due to the heat loss and no need for a boundary condition.

Cheers Edgar

-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Andreas, wouldn't a stationary thermal model without any heat fluxes simply equilibrate to a uniform temperature in the whole model? If this is the case you could simply integrate the total heat capacity of the model and calculate the new temperature due to the heat loss and no need for a boundary condition. Cheers Edgar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.