Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
One basic and fundamental question about boundary conditions
Posted 10 feb 2012, 05:40 GMT-5 Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions Version 3.5a 4 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I feel confused about the introduction of Lagrange multipliers in generalized Neumann boundary condition. Why do we need to have extra dependent variables? I checked relevant items in documentation, and found the following description:
"When Dirichlet boundary conditions are introduced, the finite element algorithm makes a corresponding change to the Neumann boundary conditions so that the resulting model becomes solvable."
It sounds like there exists certain inconsistency within Neumann and Dirichlet BC's, making the equation system unsolvable.
If anyone knows about these details, could u please explain it? Thanks a lot! I really feel unsafe to run simulations with doubts in underlying systems.
"When Dirichlet boundary conditions are introduced, the finite element algorithm makes a corresponding change to the Neumann boundary conditions so that the resulting model becomes solvable."
It sounds like there exists certain inconsistency within Neumann and Dirichlet BC's, making the equation system unsolvable.
If anyone knows about these details, could u please explain it? Thanks a lot! I really feel unsafe to run simulations with doubts in underlying systems.
4 Replies Last Post 5 apr 2012, 13:14 GMT-4