Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Equation of relative permitivitty as a function of refractive indices.

Israel Alves Oliveira

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Good night!

I would like to know why the equation is of relative permitivitty as a function of the refractive indices in the COMSOL differs from that of the literature.

epsilon_r: (n - k)² = (n² + k²) - 2ink - Comsol

epsilon_r: (n² - k²) + 2ink - Literature.

Thank you!


2 Replies Last Post 3 ott 2020, 22:01 GMT-4
Robert Koslover Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 3 ott 2020, 21:31 GMT-4

Hmm.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index#Complex_refractive_index This may have to do with the choice of the sign in the exp(i omega t) term?

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Hmm. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refractive_index#Complex_refractive_index This may have to do with the choice of the sign in the exp(i omega t) term?

Israel Alves Oliveira

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 3 ott 2020, 22:01 GMT-4

It may be because of the harmonic response in metamaterials. I have to investigate further. Thank you!

It may be because of the harmonic response in metamaterials. I have to investigate further. Thank you!

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.