Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
7 ott 2020, 10:42 GMT-4
Updated:
4 years ago
7 ott 2020, 10:45 GMT-4
You can choose the default solver for any particular problem, if you like. Just don't assume it will be optimal (and it often will not be). Look at, and work through, step by step, the relevant examples in the Application Library, including tutorial examples. Build, and run/debug small simple models before you attempt more complicated models. Investigate the impact of meshing options too. It's a bit like medical school; you have to dissect a frog or two, before you are ready to perform a human kidney transplant. (I exaggerate, perhaps, but the analogy still holds.) In regard to solvers, I use PARDISO often for RF problems, unless the problem is too computationally large. But there is much more to solving than choosing a solver; there are all sorts of parameters to choose, and modeling choices to make, that can make or break your solution.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
You can choose the default solver for any particular problem, if you like. Just don't assume it will be optimal (and it often will not be). Look at, and work through, step by step, the relevant examples in the Application Library, including tutorial examples. Build, and run/debug small simple models before you attempt more complicated models. Investigate the impact of meshing options too. It's a bit like medical school; you have to dissect a frog or two, before you are ready to perform a human kidney transplant. (I exaggerate, perhaps, but the analogy still holds.) In regard to solvers, I use PARDISO often for RF problems, unless the problem is too computationally large. But there is much more to solving than choosing a solver; there are all sorts of parameters to choose, and modeling choices to make, that can make or break your solution.