Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Malfunctioning of HT Module

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I am not certain why this result is appearing before me. This is a simple HT case where we had provided the temperature at two boundary as 597 K and 297 K just to see the intermediate temperature profile and propagation of heat within time domain.

Here the result is quite surprising like, the temperature gone down below the lower temp ( 297 K) at the near boundary of the higher temperature.

Can Anyone explain this, why this is happening.

Rgrds,

Ishant jain

--


3 Replies Last Post 2 ott 2012, 01:06 GMT-4

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 1 ott 2012, 10:14 GMT-4
Hello,

Perhaps the problem is the discontinuity in initial conditions in T in one of the boundaries. Any (in space or time) discontinuity yields convergence problems easily. You could try a ramp function for the boundary conditon, like:
293.15[K]+300[K]*rm1(t/1[s]), where rm(t) has been defined as a ramp function, rising smoothly from 0 to 2 seconds, for instance.

A finer mesh in the 'problematic' boundary is also advised.

Bye,

Jesus.
Hello, Perhaps the problem is the discontinuity in initial conditions in T in one of the boundaries. Any (in space or time) discontinuity yields convergence problems easily. You could try a ramp function for the boundary conditon, like: 293.15[K]+300[K]*rm1(t/1[s]), where rm(t) has been defined as a ramp function, rising smoothly from 0 to 2 seconds, for instance. A finer mesh in the 'problematic' boundary is also advised. Bye, Jesus.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 2 ott 2012, 00:18 GMT-4
Hi Ishant,

The problem is related to time steps and mesh size.

Please check this thread: www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/16808#p46163

--
Tolga
Hi Ishant, The problem is related to time steps and mesh size. Please check this thread: http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/16808#p46163 -- Tolga

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 2 ott 2012, 01:06 GMT-4
The finer meshing at the bounder layer works well.

I will request you to please give some detail about this ramp function.


Hello,

Perhaps the problem is the discontinuity in initial conditions in T in one of the boundaries. Any (in space or time) discontinuity yields convergence problems easily. You could try a ramp function for the boundary conditon, like:
293.15[K]+300[K]*rm1(t/1[s]), where rm(t) has been defined as a ramp function, rising smoothly from 0 to 2 seconds, for instance.

A finer mesh in the 'problematic' boundary is also advised.

Bye,

Jesus.





--
ishant.jain@tatasteel.com
The finer meshing at the bounder layer works well. I will request you to please give some detail about this ramp function. [QUOTE] Hello, Perhaps the problem is the discontinuity in initial conditions in T in one of the boundaries. Any (in space or time) discontinuity yields convergence problems easily. You could try a ramp function for the boundary conditon, like: 293.15[K]+300[K]*rm1(t/1[s]), where rm(t) has been defined as a ramp function, rising smoothly from 0 to 2 seconds, for instance. A finer mesh in the 'problematic' boundary is also advised. Bye, Jesus. [/QUOTE] -- ishant.jain@tatasteel.com

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.