Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Adaptive moving mesh for time dependant problems - need some help with stability.
Posted 19 feb 2010, 04:48 GMT-5 Mesh 11 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
The problem is incredibly non-linear, as you might imagine and inverted mesh elements run rampant. Currently, I can get it to converge nicely by tweaking the nonlinear solver settings but this runs very slowly. Alternately, I can make it run quickly, but with substantial inverted elements and NL fails.
I've run out of ideas of how to obtain this dream in a stable and efficient manner. Does anybody have some advice? I attach my sim file for reference (the mathematical derivation is widely available in literature).
Thanks,
Mike
Attachments:
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
www-m2.ma.tum.de/foswiki/pub/M2/Allgemeines/ProfessorSimeon/plinningersimeon.pdf
maybe it can give you some ideas. At the end, your solution will make our life lot easier.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Best,
Mike
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I am happy that this thread is not yet dead! I suspended my own investigation on this due to lack of convergence but would be very interested if you have success!
I briefly flirted with the idea of recasting the 2-D time dependent problem into a 3-D stationary problem (time as the axis) and then letting the adaptive meshing stationary solver chew through it with the idea being that it could locally refine both space and time resolution. The result was massive RAM consumption and paging which eventually ground progress to a halt. Maybe it would be useful for you though?
Cheers,
Mike
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi,
i have a problem with Moving mesh in a simulation with phase change. i want to use moving mesh method to solve two-dimensional Phase change problems with natural convection.The difficulty in solving these problem is the presence of the moving interface between the solid and liquid regions.
Have you ideas?
Thank you very much
--
------------------------------
Best regards
QTran
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Pretty much all of my experience with the Stefan approach to phase change is in my thesis (www.mikewelland.com/publications/phdthesis) so you can take a look at that. Does the topology of your problem change (ie: do your interfaces join, split or dissappear / appear?) If so you could take a look at using the phase-field model too (also in the thesis although an early formulation).
Good luck!
Mike
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi Mike,
thank you for your answer, i would like to make a simulation of phase change by freezing, the fluid is water, in the attach file you can see my modell. You know that when a material changes phase, for instance from liquid to solid, energy is added to the liquid, the mesh at first is fine near the solid (zylinder) but after the phase change, there is solid (ice), and ofcourse the mesh must change at the interface between Solid and liquid.
--
------------------------------
Best regards
QTran
Attachments:
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
As I understand it, you are looking to implement the Stefan model for phase change with a moving mesh. It is a fairly common technique for the sort of thing and there are several resources available. In the thesis, the derivation is on page 33 (ignore the mass transport part).
Good luck!
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
As I understand it, you are looking to implement the Stefan model for phase change with a moving mesh. It is a fairly common technique for the sort of thing and there are several resources available. In the thesis, the derivation is on page 33 (ignore the mass transport part).
Good luck!
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi Mike,
i understand these theories, but i don't know how to used it with Comsol, can you give me a example.
Thank you very much
--
------------------------------
Best regards
QTran
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Attached is a demo I made a while ago. It should be sufficient to get you started.
Attachments:
Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.
Suggested Content
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Performing a Mesh Refinement Study
- BLOG Two Methods for Modeling Free Surfaces in COMSOL Multiphysics®
- FORUM Need help in plotting Graph
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Improving Convergence of Transient Models
- FORUM Need Help in Designing 3D BLDC Motor