Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtra

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Difference between "Log" and "Linear" equation formulation, Plasma module

Posted 28 feb 2013, 12:36 GMT-5 Plasma Physics 5 Replies

Peyman Dordizadeh
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi everyone,

I have a question which couldn't find any answer in the documents. I'm modeling positive corona discharge in plasma module. The documents of software suggest to set the "Equation formulation" as "log" which solves the model for logarithm of "electron density" and "electron energy density" rather than solving for "electron density" or "electron energy density" itself.

There's something I don't understand, The results for logarithmic formulation and linear formulation are totally different from each other. Results of linear formulation seem to be making sense compared to the real experimental data; but there's still a big problem with linear formulation which produces negative values for ions' number density.

I'm thinking about getting back to logarithmic formulation, but first I have to figure out the reason of the huge difference between linear and logarithmic results.

I do appreciate any insight or idea about this issue.
Peyman.
5 Replies Last Post 5 ago 2015, 18:47 GMT-4
COMSOL Moderator

Hello Peyman Dordizadeh

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.

Jane Ni
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 14 ott 2013, 04:18 GMT-4
Hi~~ have you solved your problem? I came across the same problem as yours. So I also wondering why?


Hi everyone,

I have a question which couldn't find any answer in the documents. I'm modeling positive corona discharge in plasma module. The documents of software suggest to set the "Equation formulation" as "log" which solves the model for logarithm of "electron density" and "electron energy density" rather than solving for "electron density" or "electron energy density" itself.

There's something I don't understand, The results for logarithmic formulation and linear formulation are totally different from each other. Results of linear formulation seem to be making sense compared to the real experimental data; but there's still a big problem with linear formulation which produces negative values for ions' number density.

I'm thinking about getting back to logarithmic formulation, but first I have to figure out the reason of the huge difference between linear and logarithmic results.

I do appreciate any insight or idea about this issue.
Peyman.


Hi~~ have you solved your problem? I came across the same problem as yours. So I also wondering why? [QUOTE] Hi everyone, I have a question which couldn't find any answer in the documents. I'm modeling positive corona discharge in plasma module. The documents of software suggest to set the "Equation formulation" as "log" which solves the model for logarithm of "electron density" and "electron energy density" rather than solving for "electron density" or "electron energy density" itself. There's something I don't understand, The results for logarithmic formulation and linear formulation are totally different from each other. Results of linear formulation seem to be making sense compared to the real experimental data; but there's still a big problem with linear formulation which produces negative values for ions' number density. I'm thinking about getting back to logarithmic formulation, but first I have to figure out the reason of the huge difference between linear and logarithmic results. I do appreciate any insight or idea about this issue. Peyman. [/QUOTE]
Peyman Dordizadeh
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 14 ott 2013, 11:02 GMT-4
Hi

Unfortunately I don't have answer for this. I totally switched to logarithmic because of those negative values in linear mode.

Regards.
Peyman.
Hi Unfortunately I don't have answer for this. I totally switched to logarithmic because of those negative values in linear mode. Regards. Peyman.
Daniel Smith COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 15 ott 2013, 10:31 GMT-4
Hi Peyman, for the same initial conditions, the log and linear formulations should give the same results. The log formulation is the default option because it prevents negative values for the electron density, mean electron energy and heavy species mass fractions from occurring. If you have a model which gives different results for the two formulations, please send it to support@comsol.com so we can investigate.
Hi Peyman, for the same initial conditions, the log and linear formulations should give the same results. The log formulation is the default option because it prevents negative values for the electron density, mean electron energy and heavy species mass fractions from occurring. If you have a model which gives different results for the two formulations, please send it to support@comsol.com so we can investigate.
Peyman Dordizadeh
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 15 mag 2014, 23:06 GMT-4
It's been a while since I posted this topic, but I realized later that the difference between two formulations actually is the fact that the log formulation has stabilization term term which adds exponential term to the source term of the species trying to avoid approaching zero density. If you got rid of that stabilization term you'll have same results as linear formulation.
It's been a while since I posted this topic, but I realized later that the difference between two formulations actually is the fact that the log formulation has stabilization term term which adds exponential term to the source term of the species trying to avoid approaching zero density. If you got rid of that stabilization term you'll have same results as linear formulation.
Alexander Lindsay
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 9 years ago 5 ago 2015, 18:47 GMT-4
Peyman (or anyone): where did you find the form of the stabilization terms that Comsol adds for the plasma model for the logarithmic formulation? I'm looking in the equation view and not finding anything.
Peyman (or anyone): where did you find the form of the stabilization terms that Comsol adds for the plasma model for the logarithmic formulation? I'm looking in the equation view and not finding anything.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content